Does Creationism belong in science classes? Gomer gives his thoughts!
Search
Follow Us On Social Media!
Recent Podcasts- Thespian Talk #261 (Twitter’s Bad Musk Problem)
- Thespian Talk U.K. Politics Special (We Don’t Know Either)
- Thespian Talk #260 (The Beginning of The End)
- State of the Show 9/19/2022
- Thespian Talk #259 (Ditch Weed)
- Thespian Talk #258 (Welcome to Gamer High!)
- Thespian Talk #257 (Cutie Patootie!)
- Thespian Talk #256 (New Vax Just Dropped!)
- Thespian Talk #255 (Texan Tleilaxu & Woke-Queda?!)
- Thespian Talk #254 (CEO Slavers)
-
Recent Posts
- Under Construction
- Thespian Talk #251 (TikTok Toddler Train Videos!)
- Starbolts #538: The Logic of Attachments
- Musical Hell: Rudolph and Frosty’s Christmas in July
- Starbolts #537: The Ghost in the Machine
- Quantum Leap: Knights of the Morningstar – The Literary Lair
- Starbolts #536: Nanobots with Nothing to Lose
- Know the Score: Why the Musical Numbers in In the Heights Are So Good
Sites You May Also Enjoy
- Join 1,517 other subscribers

no. simple. because it’s not fucking science. it’s speculative theory, at best, and even that feels overly generous. really it’s just a form of “fanboyism”: desperately insecure people trying to make the facts fit their fantasy rather than accepting and coming to terms with the fact that their notion of what the universe is has been disproved. it’s actually quite childish.